maven checkstyle shouldn't warn on missing javadoc on private fields/methods

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Minor
    • 5.14.0, 4.16.1
    • Affects Version/s: 2.5.0
    • Component/s: None
    • None 

      [WARN] /GIT/grouper/grouper/src/grouper/edu/internet2/middleware/grouper/client/GrouperX509TrustManager.java:51:3: Missing a Javadoc comment. [JavadocVariable]

      It's complaining about private methods and fields. What is the coding standard? I assume it's optional, but do we want checkstyle warning about it?

            Assignee:
            Chad Redman
            Reporter:
            Chad Redman
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: